Interesting on top of interesting. President Trump mentions and imitates Senator Feinsteins’ body language as deceptive at the rally and Mandy confirms it. Perhaps he is checking out the website. As I understand it only her Congresswoman, Feinstein’s office and Katz’s law firm knew her identity. One of those three had to be the leaker. I also found it highly suspicious that when asked about the Committee’s offer to see her confidentially in California, Blase- Ford seemed surprised and Katz covered her mic and cited attorney-client privilege before she could answer if her attorneys told her about the offer. Putting two and two together- collusion between Feinstein and Katz to use this woman to provide a public spectacle if needed.Feinsteins minions do the leaking and Katz conceals the offer of confidentiality to ensure it is a public hearing. If so a huge violation of legal ethics and destroying multiple lives in the process. Now it comes out that Flake met with Rosenstein prior to announcing his modified conditional vote. These people are evil. Hope the theories of military tribunals are true. Thanks, Mandy, keep up the good work.

Hi Mandy, I’ve just registered today to your site.

Just wanted to say I think you are bloody marvellous and funny too.

Keep it up please.

That’s pretty much what I was thinking too.

Lawyers are like a cross breed between weasels, snakes and sharks.

Signed up for Gold today after literally watching every video you have on YouTube yesterday. Love what you do! Keep up the good work!

Interesting picture of Murkowski with Feinstein

Sounds to me like President Trump may be a fan…. He just commented in his press conference on trade, “according to Feinsteins body language, it looks like she lied”….. Awesome if the President is watching your Vids!

Mandy, thank you so much for this timely analysis!!!!

Another video idea is to show a legitimate sexual assault victim’s testimony in contrast to Ford’s testimony.

Keep kicking butt!

Congratulations on the massive audience for your Ford analysis. I have been struggling to reconcile how she can have passed a polygraph showing that she believes what she is saying and yet be so unbelievable at the same time having plainly been expertly coached (as in your Stair video part two. Then i came upon some material on YOUTube about memory and how it can be manipulated as it is always a construction, but especially after 36 years. Interesting that her memories are ‘recovered’ through psychotherapy and only parts of it are vivid. Many other important parts totally blank. Also that she recovered the first part of this memory at the time that Judge Kavanaugh was mooted as possibly being Romney’s choice as a Supreme Court justice at a time when Romney was regarded as a possible POTUS. Her field of expertise, her job position, strong family connections to the CIA make her a good candidate to be manipulated by unknown parties 12 years ago just as she is plainly being manipulated now by Feinstein and unknown others now. Not exactly a Manchurian Candidate but certainly a good ‘insurance policy’ to be held in reserve for when needed.

I agree with you about the ladies behind Ms. Feinstein. The long haired lady has that “cat who caught the canary” look on her face. I’m with you..she knows who leaked that letter. I still can’t over it that she is 85 years old. Term limits! I about lost it when you said, “the bald woman”, since that’s first thing I thought when I saw her: what a haircut! If she isn’t a Cancer patient, that’s ridiculous on a woman, in my opinion. You really do a great job for being “your opinion only”, for sure!

Glad to be back at this website. I missed everyone. Between Gateway Pundit, Breibart, Rantingly and probably a few others, posting your videos, I’m so glad for the well deserved exposure your recent videos are receiving. Since this one is about to take off, too, https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/body-language-expert-feinstein-is-hiding-something-she-stutters-looks-down-and-appears-nervous-when-asked-about-leaks-video/, are there any plans to upgrade this site to handle all the traffic you should be getting from here on out? (This site could become the next “Daily Paul”! LOL)

Can we PLEASE get a video with your analysis of Kate Snow interviewing Julie Swetnick (creepy porn lawyer’s accuser of Kavanaugh) on MSNBC?

PRETTY PRETTY PLEASE?!?!?!?

Anyone who who does not support and or defend the fundamental cultural and legal ethic, a person is not guilty until proven otherwise, does not belong on the Senate Judiciary Committee. How can they be trusted with the responsibility to elect a justice if they cannot coordinate their opinions around this simple ideal?

oooo oooo ooo… lookie lookie who watched your feinstein analysis… oh yeah https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=145&v=7epJ3B4qD58 — 2:14 min. don’t think for a moment potus is the interpreter! have heard several people making reference to this particular analysis.

this is from a BBC interview Italy’s interior minister did a few weeks ago. It might be interesting to do avideo o nit.

This was wonderful and funny. You are a genius at this. Thank you, I needed a good chuckle today. God bless you!

I too agree, that there is 2 sides of Feinstein’s body language. The picture of her aggressive stand against the person in the flowered dress is not the behavior for the public hearing. I love the fact that @POTUS is also watching and commenting about it too! It is sad to not have Feinstein’s whole staff on video as she was talking, but if you noticed her when she first came in, the bald lady was so guarded, she has the ‘languid’ look.

I made this video for you guys (for some comic relief…)

https://www.real.video/5842923323001

Besides your astute interpretation of her body language, it was very obvious every time she said the word “rape” or “sexual assault”, Kavanaughs’ name came up right behind it. Only to equate the two.
Feinstein began by painting the picture and then Ford tried to explain further but she couldn’t come up with any facts.
Good rehearsal of events that would try to make her believable and cause to humiliate, making her the victim at every turn!
When asked how it had affected her life, her comment was her grades went down. Boooo Hooo! She still managed to have a relationship with a man ( and I’d like to see what kind of a character he is) and children!!
How much is she getting paid!!? Attorney is pro bono. And she’s “had to move around, disrupting her family .” I’d like to know where those accommodations are!!
What do her students say about her?
I saw some of the articles she has written too. FLUFF!
God Bless Brett and his family!
GMa FNP RN