Body Language – Tucker Carlson Vs Swalwell – The Case For Russian Collusion

Note: All comments in my videos are strictly my opinion.

33
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
14 Comment threads
19 Thread replies
17 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
17 Comment authors
Patrick Archermadvinmrykchrisvirgo26MandyA Mad Chatter Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
jimmer
Member
Noble Member
jimmer

Rep. Swallwell has proven himself to be a r-o-y-a-l creep and an excellent example of why lawyers shouldn’t be allowed to run for political office. He, like his cohorts, believes the rest of us are as stupid as their brain-dead minion. Eventually, dishonest folks like this crumble and fall on their face. We await that event.

redneckdavinci
Member
Member
redneckdavinci

Lawyers are the ones who made freedom illegal. And this one is a true slimebag. Tucker just isn’t mean enough to be a good interviewer. I don’t think he’s cynical enough to understand that evil is irrational and doesn’t respond well to reason. But another great video! Weasels like this need to be exposed for what they are.

Mandy
Admin
Noble Member
Mandy

there was a law i believe back in the 1800s that lawyers cant be in govt

JohnPhillips0
Member
Member

There was a time before that where the colonists considered banning layers.

Sonny
Member
Member
Sonny

Another good topic presented. If this was a debate about collusion, then I’m not sure what Carlson didn’t start by presenting a definition of collusion that they could both agree on. The first rule of Socratic debate is that you have to get the opposing party to commit a belief in something concrete…then attack it. The problem was that Tucker allowed himself to attack vacuous commentary. I think he would have been on firmer footing by getting this fellow to confirm a joint belief in the very definition of the illicit conduct they were debating. So why didn’t he present Wikipedia’s definition which seems as good as any: “Collusion is an agreement between two or more parties, sometimes illegal–but always secretive–to limit open competition by deceiving, misleading, or defrauding others of their legal rights, or to obtain an objective forbidden by law typically by defrauding or gaining an unfair market advantage.” Point 1. Certainly a press conference is not secret. Swalwell’s argument that we may need the advantage of 25 years of hindsight to discover the secret nature of this press conference is about as absurd as it gets. Point 2. I suppose Swalwell’s argument would have been (based on… Read more »

redneckdavinci
Member
Member
redneckdavinci

That is a truly impressive comment. It’s so nice to see critical thinking in action. A rarity in all times, but always appreciated. Well, not by all……

Truffel
Member
Member
Truffel

Mandy, you are soo funny and right on the point. Spoken words like trumps invite to those who hacked the doc to release more documents will never be upheld in any court without backing evidence – of which there is none. What a joker this Swalwell (swallow wel dnc crap) lol

Mandy
Admin
Noble Member
Mandy

thank you

SANDRA
Member
Active Member
SANDRA

Brilliant analysis. Totally riveting. Thanks! Isn’t this awful, but I had a flash of this guy and Peter Pettigrew from Harry Potter. (I am visual!)

Mandy
Admin
Noble Member
Mandy

lmao!!! 😆

GOMF3602
Member
Noble Member
GOMF3602

Funny, I saw this live and was picking up on the same rehearsed talking points. You are right about Tucker. On one hand he produces some of the best and most coherent commentaries around. When he interviews somebody, especially somebody he can’t throw off with reason or sarcasm, though, and somebody who sticks to the script like this rodent or a psychopath like Yvette Felarca, he has trouble winning arguments. This Swalwell is one of the oiler weasels around. His phony earnest voice tone and baby face probably take a lot of people in. Thanks for the video!

Mandy
Admin
Noble Member
Mandy

They greased him up good

BethJ547
Member
Active Member
BethJ547

Swalwell never searched any region of his brain and rarely blinked. Is he a robot???

redneckdavinci
Member
Member
redneckdavinci

C’mon, he’s a politician/lawyer. No brain to access.

BethJ547
Member
Active Member
BethJ547

There’s that… smile

linda
Member
Member
linda

How does this guy define the meaning “evidence” ? Does the word evidence mean the same to him as it does to me?
I guess “It depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘is’ is.”

Kd7ign
Member
Active Member
Kd7ign

I think he watches your videos. If I look away I’m hiding something so I must not look away. Someone here said car salesman. And I thought bingo. He like every car salesman I’ve ever dealt with. Slimy Swallwell.

Mandy
Admin
Noble Member
Mandy

oh they watch…they dont like 😡

kdsexton1
Member
Member
kdsexton1

Rep. Swalwell also has the expression and face of an insurance salesman or car dealer.

chips
Member
Active Member
chips

God give me strength. How do these people get elected for public office?

redneckdavinci
Member
Member
redneckdavinci

Only the corrupt seek power over others. Real people seek power over themselves.

JohnPhillips0
Member
Member

He carried on about encouragement to hack a server that has been taken offline as his biggest point. There is no way that the emails come from that server. Trump was asking someone who had already hacked to supply the emails. The fact that someone came up with the missing emails would have proven that Hillary’s server was hacked. He was not asking. for emails from the DNC server.that had been hacked. There was a lot of distortion of the facts.

JohnPhillips0
Member
Member

There is no way that trump could expect anyone to hack Hillary’s server. Bu that time it had been disassembled and the FBI was examing the drives for more emails. There for that is a flat lie without using body language.

Mandy
Admin
Noble Member
Mandy

you cant talk reason to a lunatic…just lunacy

Patrick Archer
Member
Active Member
Patrick Archer

This Swalwell fellow is the lawmaker who said he wants to confiscate all firearms. So, I knew from that that he is a Stalinists or a Maoist. (I can’t say I know the difference.) He’s a Leftist for sure, and if he gains power, he will likely kill millions.

Donate? Every little helps

Other places you can find me