Note: All comments in my videos are strictly my opinion.[cryptothanks]
Body Language – Harvey Weinstein In Courtroom – Is He Remorseful?
TelegramNotificationsGet instant notifications the moment a new video is released!
Odysee Channel
If you are looking for an older video. This is the place to find it.
VIEW CHANNEL
His victims better beware..
Hm, Milo’s book comes out soon. Called Despicable and that will possibly keep you busy for a while.
When the video get’s to 6:08.. the lawyer double blinks on the word **Fax**
I wonder if the lawyer planned to communicate with old school, less traceable tech?
Regardless it reminded me of this video!
lmao
How did he do that? Omigosh!
the last # was 3 😉
The first one he blinked on 3 as well. Maybe you need to take brain-blink latency into account. lol
voice tone/flection/speed
Voice Tone OK… Maybe… Actually I belive you are correct. My confusion is about the HOWS. How did a slight change in these behaviors influence, actually command an entire audience and then some to do exactly his subtle suggestion? 😐
That was good!
Having worked with numerous sex offenders, in the juvenile prison and locked psych ward, I have seen his type before. There is no remorse there. He is the psychopathic type. Some offenders are compulsively acting out issues from their past and with a lot of treatment can be capable of remorse. Then there are sociopaths, who understand that what they did was wrong, feel no remorse, and never will, but attempt to simulate it to either decrease the consequences or convince others that they constitute no further threat. As you aptly point out with Weinstein, there is nothing there but disdain. The fact that he does not even attempt to look remorseful shows how dangerous he potentially is. This is the type of individual, who, if he had the resources and opportunity, would do what he could to buy off, intimidate, or take out witnesses. That is why you saw the reaction when the “no contact” OOP was discussed, I think. Sad commentary that scum like this evil individual had so many enablers and pimps in Hollywood/AKA Gomorrah. You guys are right to back up Patreon. They recently banned Faith Goldy and others. Since you promote truth and threaten the PC fantasy world they will probably come after you too. Thanks for the video and for what you do!
I also work with adolescents who are in and out of juvenile hall, group homes, gang affiliated… the whole shebang. They are tough. They can be really mean and often scary. I would much prefer to spend my time with my hardcore homies than I would this creep. He is without any compassion.
He has no remorse. He feels bad for no one but himself. He is not ashamed either. He is simply caught, trapped and pissed. His face and body resemble a bull fenced in just before it enters into a wild, enraged, bullfight. He is behind the fence because he is not permitted to step outside of it. He will behave as he is told. He will agree to be a good bull in order to save his… cojones, but his core is rage, untamed, entitled, testosterone packed TORO! This animal is NEVER TO BE TRUSTED!
Nancy Pelosi disagrees with you! 😆
Lol
Oh Brother! You’re right. Not that I need Nancy’s approval, but, I’ll rephrase the last part… This Creature is NEVER TO BE TRUSTED!
Better? 😉
Devils advocate here because I’m trying to think like he does…. his belief system!
My question is if everyone knew the deal (a visit with this man gives you a role) and everyone had agreed to it for what, a decade or more?, then should he be remorseful?
If the only rule was admit you are sorry when we ask you to because you overstepped the mark with only those women and we are paying them to keep quiet, then why be remorseful if all those that sent women my way (that creepy Oprah and the blonde photo comes to mind) are not remorseful?
That woman recently that called out the people in the Audience at Cannes comes to mind
https://www.nbcnews.com/nightly-news/video/actress-asia-argento-claims-she-was-raped-by-harvey-weinstein-at-cannes-during-searing-speech-1238073411539
Well the ‘casting couch’ doesn’t seem much different than a guy or gal that hires a hooker to me. So I would kind of agree with you, if he wasn’t also accused of rape. And yes.. how come the media haven’t gone after Oprah for being an ‘enabler’ at best.. and a pimp at worst.
Just putting this up front……I am not saying he has not raped anyone……
Regret sex, or having sex with someone and feeling repulsed with yourself after, or having obligatory sex and not getting what was promised or hoped for, is not rape.
Women are emotionally bound to the actions they do (mostly) and they cannot go around having sex like men do. It does impact them differently and even though many in Hollywood willingly slept their way into roles I can guarentee it left many feeling emotionally damaged.
There is a reason so many relationships fail in Hollywood, they have drug and alcohol problems, and they are on their moral high ground on what everyone should be. I guess standing up for identity politics makes them feel a little but better about the sordid life they live after they sell their souls.
I can’t disagree!
Exactly. This whole Me2 thing is crazy. These women (from what little attention I’ve paid to it) were using their bodies as currency and then they felt cheap (for a reason) for doing so and took it out on him. I’m not justifying him in any way, but as long as both parties were aware of it and he didn’t force himself on them, he has nothing to feel remorseful about. I also don’t blame him for his feeling of defiance in a courtroom. If you’ve ever been through the legal system you quickly learn that justice is not a factor. Money is what they are after. I can guarantee you that there was an immediate attempt to go after the money by the DA. I’m not saying he’s a nice guy; but that doesn’t mean he’s any more guilty than the women he slept with that got their roles. Rape charges without evidence are hearsay. Sort of like the Cosby conviction. But who needs that silly rule of law anyway.
I was trying to think what animal he reminds me of – that’s it – a bull!
He kept naturally falling into the, head back, looking down the nose. Only to be shortly followed by reminders that he wasn’t in charge there.
He is definitely gonna contact the victims, some how.
I like the way he gestured the clipboard to be taken away from him with his chin.
He can’t even act remorseful. Let alone feel it.
Good catch. That clipboard gesture was at 11:21.
Lol.. I think he was sacrificial wolf. Build the #metoo movement. Establish the ‘correct’ public response to sexual misconduct allegations, whether substantiated or not. Then go after Trump. It hasn’t worked, but at least they picked a real rat bag to get the ball rolling.
I guess he got too greedy and women now have rights and all and were refusing to be alone with him. Easy to get rid of him because he was just too difficult to control
And your students are watching. I didn’t see one iota of remorse. Strictly my opinion.
🙂
This man makes me scared.. He seems to think that he is above all. That is a bad character on a person. God bless his victims????
Interesting man in the background. Seems sad and worried.
Did you see the look on the police officers face when the Judge slipped up on the bail and said 10 Thousand instead of 10 Million?
Also when the Judge says Connecticut and New York for his Bail the Police Officer looks up on New York… is that just a random look or does that Officer think he should not be allowed in New York?
Harvey’s lawyer looks a lot like Martin Shkreli’s lawyer.
Only the anointed could get away without doing jail time.
*cough*
https://pastebin.com/YwApLhts
paste related
He is one of many.
Since the 60s women and men advocated “Free” sex. The replacement of intimate relations with “Free Sex” has its price. Indeed women are mostly the victims, but, the Lie that woman and man are the same is uncovered here: woman who walk half naked, and are “free” cannot expect men to remain indifferent… in that aspect Weinstein is also a victim. Where is the “red line”???? Long lost.
As far of usage of sex, well, both sexes used it plenty. Sadly.
He is one of many. Since the 60s intimate relations were abused both by women and men. He is also a victim of this problem. Women are NOT victims. I am a woman and I can see his view point!
Maybe I missed something, but I don’t recall this man being convicted of a crime yet. I believe he has been charged with a crime…but has actually pleaded “not guilty”. Which part of the “not guilty” pleas did anyone not understand? Why, then, should anyone rationally entertain the idea that he should be expected to show remorse about anything at this point?
Is it because “is he remorseful?” begs the question of being convicted in the court of public (or personal) opinion? Thats hardly fair…or appropriate. Legally speaking, none of those courts amount to a hill of beans. I believe if we’d actually allow our criminal justice system to run its due course, then we’d have a lot less unproductive monkey dancing in our society.
Since none of you witnessed the alleged crime(s), nor have considered any of the actual evidence of the alleged crime(s) in a court of law, I suggest searching for evidence of remorse at a later and more appropriate time.
Cheers!
Yeh.. and OJ Simpson is innocent. 🙄
Yes. He was found innocent of the 1st degree murders of Nicole Simpson and Ronald Goldman in a criminal trial. The jury in that case found that there was not enough evidence to conclude, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he was their murderer. LIke it or not, that’s the way our criminal justice system works here in the U.S. However, I’ve yet to discover an alternative system that has been proven flawless. Have you, Mad Chatter?
You should also bear in mind that O.J. Simpson was found guilty of the wrongful deaths of Simpson and Goldman in a civil suit. It is true, in this respect, that he was held legally responsible for their deaths.
he wasn’t found innocent, he was found not guilty by a jury so dumb, it’s not even funny. not guilty and innocent are not the same. should he went to prison, oh ye he should. that’s not how our criminal justice system works, it failed miserably at this case.
I stand corrected. He was, indeed, found “not guilty” rather than “innocent” of 1st degree murder.
Criminally speaking, the net result is the same however. He will never be punished by a court of law for the alleged crime of 1st degree murder of Simpson and Goldman. The nuance here is that proving innocence only matters in the court of public opinion, not criminal court. It is true that he did have to endure the stress and expense of standing trial vs. having the charges dropped. I would also allow that having charges dropped before a trial began could have indicated a measure of innocence in the court of public opinion. The upside for him is that by enduring a criminal trial and being found not guilty (or, in other words, acquitted of the accusation) he gains the legal protection of double jeopardy whereby he can never be tried again for the same alleged crime. That could be considered beneficial to him should he have actually committed the crimes.
BTW, I don’t have an opinion on whether he was guilty or not because I was not witness to the crime scene nor did I ever have an opportunity to carefully consider the evidence. That’s what juries are for…and to my knowledge there is no IQ test necessary for participation in a jury. Whether you believe O.J.’s jury was dumb or not is irrelevant. Also, I’m happy to leave the court of public opinion and speculation to others who wish to waste their time and energy on it.
Anyhow, thanks for pointing out the legal discrepancy in my post. This prompted me to investigate and share this interesting nuance which I believe is important to be aware of.
Cheers!